Chief Returning Officer: Difference between revisions

Warner c (talk | contribs)
Warner c (talk | contribs)
Line 26: Line 26:
The [[General Assembly]] of Fall 2017 resulted in a change to the organization of referendum forum for discussion. Previously, it was expected that the CRO arrange a debate between all [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A09:_Referendum.E2.80.8B_.E2.80.8BCommittee|Referendum Committees]], however, in the event where all Referendum Committees support a ''Yes'' vote for their respective referendum question, a debate is not a productive format for distribution of information to the EUS. Therefore, [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A03:_Responsibilities.C2.A0}|Article 3.1.9]] now reads:
The [[General Assembly]] of Fall 2017 resulted in a change to the organization of referendum forum for discussion. Previously, it was expected that the CRO arrange a debate between all [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A09:_Referendum.E2.80.8B_.E2.80.8BCommittee|Referendum Committees]], however, in the event where all Referendum Committees support a ''Yes'' vote for their respective referendum question, a debate is not a productive format for distribution of information to the EUS. Therefore, [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A03:_Responsibilities.C2.A0}|Article 3.1.9]] now reads:


{{Quote
{{poll quote|Elections​ ​EUS​ ​should​ ​organize​ ​a​ ​public​ ​forum​ ​for​ ​discussion​ ​between  all​ ​referendum​ ​committees​ ​the​ ​format​ ​of​ ​which​ ​is​ ​to​ ​the​ ​discretion​ ​of  the​ ​CRO.  
|text=Elections​ ​EUS​ ​should​ ​organize​ ​a​ ​public​ ​forum​ ​for​ ​discussion​ ​between  all​ ​referendum​ ​committees​ ​the​ ​format​ ​of​ ​which​ ​is​ ​to​ ​the​ ​discretion​ ​of  the​ ​CRO.  
}}
}}