Chief Returning Officer: Difference between revisions

From EUSwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warner c (talk | contribs)
Warner c (talk | contribs)
Line 24: Line 24:


Publicizing the referendum
Publicizing the referendum
The [[General Assembly]] of Fall 2017 resulted in a change to the organization of referendum forum for discussion. Previously, it was expected that the CRO arrange a debate between all [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A09:_Referendum.E2.80.8B_.E2.80.8BCommittee|Referendum Committees]], however, in the event where all Referendum Committees support a ''Yes'' vote for their respective referendum question, a debate is not a productive format for distribution of information to the EUS.
The [[General Assembly]] of Fall 2017 resulted in a change to the organization of referendum forum for discussion. Previously, it was expected that the CRO arrange a debate between all [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A09:_Referendum.E2.80.8B_.E2.80.8BCommittee|Referendum Committees]], however, in the event where all Referendum Committees support a ''Yes'' vote for their respective referendum question, a debate is not a productive format for distribution of information to the EUS. Therefore, [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A03:_Responsibilities.C2.A0}|Article 3.1.9]] now reads:
 
{{Quote
|text=Elections​ ​EUS​ ​should​ ​organize​ ​a​ ​public​ ​forum​ ​for​ ​discussion​ ​between  all​ ​referendum​ ​committees​ ​the​ ​format​ ​of​ ​which​ ​is​ ​to​ ​the​ ​discretion​ ​of  the​ ​CRO.
}}


As in all cases, the role of the CRO is also to assist DROs in their referenda when they arise. In many referenda cases, this involves assisting DROs in the interpretation or understanding of their departmental bylaws, or in the navigation of the grey zone between EUS Bylaws and respective departmental bylaws.
As in all cases, the role of the CRO is also to assist DROs in their referenda when they arise. In many referenda cases, this involves assisting DROs in the interpretation or understanding of their departmental bylaws, or in the navigation of the grey zone between EUS Bylaws and respective departmental bylaws.

Revision as of 17:25, 10 May 2018

This article is still in progress. Please consider completing it.

Chief Returning Officer [CRO]
Current CRO: Camille Warner
Email: cro@mcgilleus.ca

What is the Chief Returning Officer?

The Chief Returning Officer is largely in charge of the organization and supervision of Official Elections of the EUS. Additionally, the CRO generally is a reference for the Deputy Returning Officers (DROs), who are in charge of the organization and supervision of their departmental society's elections. This organization often consists of ensuring awareness of campaigning and election bylaws, encouraging voters to be informed and vote, and moderating anything inbetween.

Responsibilities

Creation of the Electoral Calendar

Part of the job of the CRO is to plan the entire schedule for information periods, campaigning, and voting for the upcoming academic year. This constitutes the Electoral Calendar, and must be presented to the EUS Board of Governors for ratification (by simple majority) at the Board's second session of the Summer. The Electoral Calendar, if approved, is then made public in the week following. This is per Article 3.1.5 of the Electoral and Referendum Bylaws.

Referenda

The CRO has a variety of responsibilities regarding referenda. First and foremost, the CRO should be aware of all McGill-imposed due dates for referendum questions. Most questions concerning EUS student fees collected by McGill are subject to this date sensitivity. In general, the EUS President should be aware of when these dates are, as they are critical to the planning of the electoral calendar.

Publicizing the referendum The General Assembly of Fall 2017 resulted in a change to the organization of referendum forum for discussion. Previously, it was expected that the CRO arrange a debate between all Referendum Committees, however, in the event where all Referendum Committees support a Yes vote for their respective referendum question, a debate is not a productive format for distribution of information to the EUS. Therefore, [[Electoral_and_Referendum_Bylaws#Article.C2.A03:_Responsibilities.C2.A0}|Article 3.1.9]] now reads:

Elections​ ​EUS​ ​should​ ​organize​ ​a​ ​public​ ​forum​ ​for​ ​discussion​ ​between all​ ​referendum​ ​committees​ ​the​ ​format​ ​of​ ​which​ ​is​ ​to​ ​the​ ​discretion​ ​of the​ ​CRO.

As in all cases, the role of the CRO is also to assist DROs in their referenda when they arise. In many referenda cases, this involves assisting DROs in the interpretation or understanding of their departmental bylaws, or in the navigation of the grey zone between EUS Bylaws and respective departmental bylaws.

EUS Executive Committee

Online Voting System

Town Halls, Forums, and Debates

Selection Process and Accountability

Relevant Articles and Links